Watch What the Jan. 6 Committee Has Covered in Its Hearings So Far
![Watch What the Jan 6 Committee Has Covered in Its Hearings So Far](/thumb/phpThumb.php?src=%2Fuploads%2Fnews%2F39%2F3930%2F9%2F3930958-watch-what-the-jan-6-committee-has-covered-in-its-hearings-so-far.jpg&w=706&hash=f9b77fa1ee92989a9d81a042fc6e99d8)
- liveUpdates
- Today’s Hearing
- House Panel’s Endgame
- Recap of Hearings So Far
- Jan. 6 Timeline
In eight hearings, the Jan. 6 committee has examined strategies meant to keep President Trump in power, from pressuring the vice president to stoking anger that culminated in the riot at the Capitol.
-
Send any friend a story
As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.
Give this articleGive this articleGive this article
![Zach Montague Zach Montague](/thumb/phpThumb.php?src=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2019%2F12%2F13%2Freader-center%2Fauthor-zach-montague%2Fauthor-zach-montague-thumbLarge.png&w=728&hash=10f39617b13bb0b55ff86bfb2da2b29b)
- Oct. 13, 2022, 11:34 a.m. ET
With just 26 days until the midterm elections, the House Select Committee on Thursday is expected to attempt the difficult task of summarizing all of its eight previous hearings while presenting new findings in a finale designed to bring its many months of work toward a timely conclusion.
The committee’s hearings so far have looked at ways that President Donald J. Trump and his allies attempted to reverse his loss in the 2020 election — an effort that at various points touched everyone from his own vice president to state election officials, the Justice Department, and supporters who traveled to Washington and formed the mob that attacked the Capitol. In what may be the committee’s final hearing, topics it has raised in past hearings may come up again. Here’s a look back:
Capturing the ViolenceJune 9
![Video player loading](/thumb/phpThumb.php?src=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2022%2F06%2F09%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2F09dc-jan6-sub%2F09dc-jan6-sub-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg&w=728&hash=e7c9e87e223289f9b9dd8532db59559c)
The committee’s first hearing provided an introduction to its investigative efforts as well as a reminder of the raw violence that occurred on Jan. 6, nearly a year and a half before the committee’s first public hearing.
The committee did not shy away from some of the most violent moments, with dramatic footage of the Proud Boys, a right-wing extremist group, forcing their way past police and into the building, as well as testimony from a Capitol Police officer who suffered a brain injury while defending against the mob.
Through interviews with former Attorney General William P. Barr, former aides to Mr. Trump, and even his daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law Jared Kushner, the committee sought to show that many in Mr. Trump’s orbit were keenly aware that he had lost the election.
Embracing False ClaimsJune 13
![Video player loading](/thumb/phpThumb.php?src=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2022%2F06%2F13%2Fus%2F13vid-jan6-wrapup%2F13vid-jan6-wrapup-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg&w=728&hash=5ccbe837e57d5be8a80746c743f3cce9)
The second hearing continued to drill down into Mr. Trump’s state of mind after his 2020 election loss, with former advisers such as his campaign chairman, Bill Stepien, and Mr. Barr each testifying that Mr. Trump had consistently rejected their view that he had lost and that should stop repeating baseless claims of election fraud.
The committee focused on the chaotic days after the election when competing camps in the White House, which Mr. Stepien described as “Team Normal” and “Team Crazy,” vied for Mr. Trump’s attention with opposing views about how he should handle his election defeat. Much of the evidence presented indicated that Mr. Trump sided with those urging him to contest the results and continue efforts to remain in power.
Pressuring the Vice PresidentJune 16
![Video player loading](/thumb/phpThumb.php?src=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2022%2F06%2F16%2Fmultimedia%2F16dc-jan6-photo01%2F16dc-jan6-photo01-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg&w=728&hash=d526df8643c96cde54442da418df732b)
The committee’s third hearing turned to the pressure campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to go along with increasingly outlandish legal strategies aimed at helping Mr. Trump remain in power.
The committee homed in on the advice of a law professor, John Eastman, whose ideas were embraced by Mr. Trump and some of his allies, and included a legally dubious framework for how Mr. Pence could manipulate the outcome of the election.
Evidence presented at the hearing also highlighted how alarmed Mr. Pence’s aides had grown about the situation, and how close they came to coming face-to-face with outraged supporters of Mr. Trump who stormed the Capitol before Mr. Pence could certify the election results.
June 21
![Video player loading](/thumb/phpThumb.php?src=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2022%2F06%2F21%2Fus%2Fpolitics%2F21vid-jan-6-fourth-hearing-highlight-photo%2F21vid-jan-6-fourth-hearing-highlight-photo-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg&w=728&hash=5cabf3b53443e0155e4a704975392a7a)
In its forth hearing, the committee looked outside Washington to show how Mr. Trump and his allies worked to pressure Republican officials in swing states to overturn his electoral losses.
This part of the committee’s investigation centered on a scheme to name alternate slates of electors in states that would alter the electoral vote tally and produce a win for Mr. Trump in the Electoral College.
Committee members drew on testimony from several state officials who received threats of violence for pushing back against the plan.
Testing the Justice DepartmentJune 23
![Video player loading](/thumb/phpThumb.php?src=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2022%2F06%2F23%2Fmultimedia%2F23dc-jan6-photo01%2F23dc-jan6-photo01-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg&w=728&hash=862f4058b8fd813b2a9125c5961c7885)
Next, the committee set its sights on the Justice Department and the efforts by Mr. Trump to persuade officials there to interfere in the election — or install loyalists who were willing to.
The committee drew on testimony suggesting that Mr. Trump determinedly urged senior officials to publicly depict the election as hopelessly riddled with fraud, paving the way for others to take steps to overturn Mr. Trump’s loss.
A White House Insider SpeaksJune 28
![Video player loading](/thumb/phpThumb.php?src=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2022%2F06%2F28%2Fmultimedia%2F28jan6-hearings-takeaways-01%2F28jan6-hearings-takeaways-01-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg&w=728&hash=41078c3d4274847101af052f5e84bd14)
Stunning testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to Mr. Trump’s then chief of staff, Mark Meadows, came to define the committee’s surprise sixth hearing.
Ms. Hutchinson described Mr. Trump’s fixation on remaining in power in the days leading up to the attack on the Capitol, and detailed the chaotic hours before the riot. During that time, she testified, Trump planned to join the rioters arriving at the Capitol building. The committee is expected to return to those moments during its hearing on Thursday.
Stoking ResentmentJuly 12
![Video player loading](/thumb/phpThumb.php?src=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2022%2F07%2F12%2Fmultimedia%2F12jan6-hearing-takeaways-4%2F12jan6-hearing-takeaways-4-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg&w=728&hash=a12d9dbdf849b0976a0e33234e8df8ec)
The committee’s seventh hearing focused on the various channels through which Mr. Trump and his inner circle led supporters to believe that the election had been stolen, and attempted to stir up popular opposition to the election result after a range of legal strategies to overturn the outcome sputtered.
Committee members made the case that Mr. Trump and his allies sought to stir up public resentment, culminating in the events of Jan. 6, after it appeared that few other options remained for Mr. Trump to stay in power.
Refusing to Concede July 21![Video player loading](/thumb/phpThumb.php?src=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2022%2F07%2F22%2Fworld%2F-21vid-Jan-6-hrg-wrap-pkg%2F-21vid-Jan-6-hrg-wrap-pkg--videoSixteenByNine3000-v2.jpg&w=728&hash=c154cc1c0f81de0f9b4b32d624ade590)
In its most recent hearing, the committee unveiled outtakes of a speech in which Mr. Trump came close to publicly accepting the election results and chastising those who breached the Capitol on Jan. 6. Mr. Trump ultimately refused to declare the election over, and released a watered-down version.
The video helped encapsulate the committee’s central conclusion, presented in pieces throughout much of the summer: Mr. Trump personally precipitated the anger among his supporters that led to the riot and never relented in refusing to concede the election — even amid the threat of widespread, real-world violence.